A client suffers loss because an agency failed to disclose that it was acting for both sides. Under section 36 of the Estate Agents Ordinance, which statement is correct?
Answer: The client has a cause of action, subject to the agent's reasonable-steps defence. Why not the others: - Only a complaint: Section 36 itself gives a civil remedy for loss caused by breach. - Sue the EAA: The EAA is not liable for a licensee's breach. - Only after conviction: A civil claim does not depend on prosecution. Rule: Where a licensed estate agent fails to comply with section 36 (including duties to disclose dual agency and interests) and the client suffers loss, the client has a cause of action against the agent, unless the agent shows it took all reasonable steps and exercised all due diligence. Source: Estate Agents Ordinance (Cap. 511), section 36; as at Oct 2026
Thinking the only remedy for a disclosure breach is a complaint to the EAA.
Practise more EAQE Estate agents' duties, discipline and commission disputes questions
Exam-style questions with worked answers, then full timed mocks. Free to start.
Build a daily practice habit : a few exam-style questions a day, with worked answers. Free to start.
Start practising →An original question written to the published EAQE syllabus. Figures in the explanation carry their effective dates; check them against the current law before relying on them. Independent exam practice. Not affiliated with or endorsed by the Estate Agents Authority (EAA) or the examination administrator.