Mrs Chow never had her tenancy agreement with her tenant stamped. The tenant now owes three months' rent, and Mrs Chow wants to sue in the District Court, relying on the agreement as evidence. Which statement is correct?
Answer: It cannot be received in evidence in civil proceedings until stamped. Late stamping with a penalty is still possible. Why not the others: - Void: lack of stamping does not make the agreement void; it limits how the document can be used. - Deduct unpaid duty: there is no such statutory set-off; liability for duty lies on the persons executing the agreement. - Only leases over 3 years: all leases are chargeable; the term only affects the rate. Rule: An unstamped tenancy agreement cannot be received in evidence in civil proceedings (other than proceedings to recover the duty) and cannot be registered at the Land Registry or acted on by a public officer. Source: EAA, A Study Guide to Estate Agency Law and Practice, Part 7, para 15; IRD FAQ on Stamping of Tenancy Agreement, Q1-Q2 (checked 11 Oct 2026); as at Oct 2026
Thinking an unstamped tenancy is void rather than unusable as evidence until stamped.
Practise more SQE Leasing and tenancy questions
Exam-style questions with worked answers, then full timed mocks. Free to start.
Build a daily practice habit : a few exam-style questions a day, with worked answers. Free to start.
Start practising →An original question written to the published SQE syllabus. Figures in the explanation carry their effective dates; check them against the current law before relying on them. Independent exam practice. Not affiliated with or endorsed by the Estate Agents Authority (EAA) or the examination administrator.