Ivy Lo and her landlord agree to end her tenancy of a flat in Kowloon Tong six months early. They sign a surrender agreement and the landlord takes back the keys. A week later the landlord finds that Ivy had damaged the built-in wardrobes months before the surrender. The surrender agreement says nothing about past breaches. Which statement is correct?
Answer: She is released from future obligations but stays liable for past breaches. Why not the others: - Releases all liability: a surrender does not excuse past breaches unless the landlord agrees to excuse them. - Registration: a surrender takes effect when the landlord accepts it by taking back possession; the agreement is evidence, and registration is not what makes it effective. - Claim rent for six months: a valid surrender is not a breach; the tenant is not liable for the early termination. Rule: A fixed term ends by surrender when the tenant gives it up and the landlord accepts by taking back possession. The tenant is not in breach for leaving early but remains liable for earlier breaches unless excused. Source: EAA, A Study Guide to Estate Agency Law and Practice, Part 7, para 34; as at Oct 2026
Assuming a surrender wipes out claims for breaches that happened before it.
Practise more SQE Leasing and tenancy questions
Exam-style questions with worked answers, then full timed mocks. Free to start.
Build a daily practice habit : a few exam-style questions a day, with worked answers. Free to start.
Start practising →An original question written to the published SQE syllabus. Figures in the explanation carry their effective dates; check them against the current law before relying on them. Independent exam practice. Not affiliated with or endorsed by the Estate Agents Authority (EAA) or the examination administrator.